Skip to main content

How Do Sources Influence Media Content?


Estimated Read Time: 3 Minutes 36 Seconds

“The relationship between journalists and sources has been linked to a tug-of-war where each is trying to manage the other to his or her own advantage” (Tully, 2008: 23). 

In order to produce a news story, journalists must rely on a source for information and clarity of the story. Otherwise, the news story would become non-objective, unclear and opinionated, which is what journalists try to avoid. 

how do sources influence the media?Journalists should select sources that will give the most appropriate information to them and therefore provide relevant information to frame a story around. Manning (2001), claims that “news media are usually regarded as a playing an important part in maintaining the flow of ideas and information upon which choices are made” (2001: 133). Manning also claims that “the less powerful are significantly disadvantaged to secure access to the media” (2001: 134). This causes problems due to the elite within society having the majority of the access to convey their opinion.

 Journalists should ensure that all opinions are conveyed within the story so citizens can make informed decisions within the public discourse so therefore a journalist should try and select appropriate sources.

Appropriate Sources 

In order to select an appropriate source, journalists must have certain criteria that the source must adhere to which will ensure a credible story. Gans (1979) has supplied a list of considerations a journalist should follow when selecting a source. This list includes; the past suitability of the source (i.e. was the source’s take on events worth reporting?), the productivity of the source (can filming and/or interview be finished within the deadline?), reliability of the source, the trustworthiness of the source, the authoritativeness of the source (is the source a leader in his/her field?) and the articulateness of the source (can the source be trusted to give a clear, concise interview?) (Gans 1979 pp 245-247). 

Stepping outside these considerations may lead the journalist to report a story that is offensive, problematic for the news organization or even potentially career-ending for a journalist. Source selection is exceedingly important when researching a story.

Selection of sources should also adhere to what the journalist wants to report in their story; Tully (2008) claims “the relationship (between sources and journalists) is often symbiotic and mutually beneficial” (2008: 101). This means that the story will benefit both the journalist and the source. 

How Do Sources Influence Media Content?


In the tug-of-war relationship that is the source and journalist alliance, sources “have a considerable advantage over the journalist” (Tully: 2008: 102). 

How do sources influence media content?
Sources can influence news content through dispensing certain information while withholding other information, offering exclusives or scoops to a journalist, leaking important information, imposing information embargoes, controlling media access to an event, giving preferred treatment to journalists or organizations (the same way a journalist picks sources) and offering freebies or junkets (Tully 2008: 103). 

Fishman contends that the world is “bureaucratically organized for journalists” (1999 [1980]: 106), declaring a reliance on bureaucratic institutions or leaders as their main source of information. Additionally,  Fishman claims that using these institutions as sources are built into the daily routine of journalism due to the stability and consistency of these types of sources. 

“Confronted with a bureaucratically constructed universe, the journalist can only reproduce bureaucratic constructs for public consumption” (Ericson, Baranek, Chan 1989: 280)".

How do sources influence media content?
Due to the demands of the corporate news market, journalists must find information that is worthwhile and has some degree of interest to the general public, not to mention within a specific timeline defined by the newsroom. Fishman also argues that bureaucratic institutions are a “fountain of information” (1999 [1980]: 108) and journalists know that there will be vast information within these institutions. This practice essentially shows that the public is being fed what an elitist, power figure or institution has to say regarding a situation. Consequently, this type of media reflects a centralized and power-based, social ideology within the final news product.



Further Reading:


Ericson, R. Baranek, P & Chan, J. (1989). Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources. 

Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the News. 

Gans, Herbert J. (1979). Sources and Journalists. 

Hall, S. (1978). Policing the Crisis. 

Manning, P. (2001) ‘Why Worry About the Sources of News’

Martinson, D. (2006). The Media, the War and Truth.

Tully, J. (2008). Journalists and Sources.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Propaganda In Hollywood: Case Studies

Estimated Read Time: 4 Minutes 20 Seconds Propaganda originates from the Latin “Congregatiode Propaganda Fide” , meaning to "spread the faith".  The contemporary definition of the word has roots as far back as World War One when the term became associated with political messages.  Propaganda has been defined in the modern sense by Jowett and O’Donnell as, “the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behaviour to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist” (2006: 163).  The seven elements of propaganda contain the ability of propaganda to tap into emotions , source credibility , opinion leaders, using music or other media as a way to trigger an irrational response, group norms, visual symbols and the language used when engaging in propaganda.  A modern propagandist can gain access to many sources of mass media, including television, movies, and radio, not to mention social media. 
Post a Comment
Continue Reading >>>

The Legal, Political, and Economic Marginalization of Maori in New Zealand

                             Estimated Read Time: 6 Minutes 12 Seconds Maori people living in New Zealand have found themselves in what Laguerre (1999), describes as ‘minoritized spaces’, dislocated from ‘white’, ‘normalized’, majority spaces. This article seeks to explain the legal, economic, political, social and cultural marginalization of the Maori people within New Zealand and how this has affected Maori society. The colonial paradigm for power and control will also be introduced to further understand how systematic marginalization has taken place in New Zealand. What Is Racial Marginalization?  Cram, 2004, describes marginalization as; “totally removing the importance and power of someone…..the forcing of peoples out of the mainstream of political, economic or social life…to push to the sidelines or the periphery of a society or dominant group” (pp1-3). Cram then applies marginalization to the New Zealand society; “Marginalization occurs when a group of people a
Post a Comment
Continue Reading >>>

Jihad vs McWorld

Barber, B. R. (1995). ‘Jihad vs. McWorld’ Estimated Read Time: 6 Minutes 14 Seconds This piece of work from Barber is perhaps one of the most interesting to study from the pre-9/11 period.  Barber accurately provides reasoning and theoretical logic as to why these two theories of civilization will eventually clash (which they did).   Jihad vs McWorld An Introduction Barber writes about two viable political figures which can exist in the modern world, at odds with each other in most points of view. These two political figures are known as ‘Jihad’ and ‘McWorld’. According to Barber, however, these two political characters have one thing in common; Jihad and McWorld are both hindering practical ways for citizens to govern themselves democratically.   Jihad and McWorld can exist in the same countries at the same time and can cause many complications, as they can operate in equal strength but contrary objectives.  Jihad is motivated by biased detestation towards non
Post a Comment
Continue Reading >>>

Why Has YouTube Become So Popular?

Estimated Read Time: 3 Minutes 44 Seconds YouTube has become a cultural phenomenon with millions of hours of videos watched and uploaded on a weekly basis. Many YouTube creators have made a career out of producing content for this massive website. This article will use sociological theories to explain the popularity of this video-sharing website. Encoding A YouTube Video For Different Audience Types Hall, claims that “using recognized codes and conventions and by drawing on audience expectations, the producer can position the audience and create a certain amount of agreement on what the code (YouTube video in this case) means” (Hall: 1980: 128). This entails that a producer of a YouTube video can “position” the YouTube videos are open to different interpretations depending on cultural background, preferred reading of the medium and the reader’s individual circumstances. An example of interpreting videos on YouTube would be if a YouTube user were to post a video of hims
Post a Comment
Continue Reading >>>